Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Causes, Testing, and What Comes Next

Recurrent pregnancy loss affects 1-2% of couples. Comprehensive guide to RPL causes, testing, treatment options including IVF with PGT-A, and prognosis.

📅 Updated July 2026 ⚕️ Medically Reviewed
Quick Answer

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as two or more pregnancy losses before 20 weeks. It affects 1–2% of couples trying to conceive. In about 50% of cases, a specific cause can be identified through testing: chromosomal abnormalities (most common), uterine abnormalities, blood clotting disorders, hormonal issues, or immune factors. IVF with PGT-A genetic testing can significantly reduce loss rates for couples with chromosomal causes.

Key Takeaways
  1. Chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo cause 50–60% of all pregnancy losses, and the rate increases with maternal age
  2. A comprehensive RPL workup includes karyotype analysis, uterine imaging, thrombophilia screening, hormonal panel, and immune testing
  3. IVF with PGT-A can identify chromosomally normal embryos before transfer, reducing miscarriage risk from 30–40% to under 10% per transfer
  4. Treatable causes include antiphospholipid syndrome (blood thinners), uterine septum (surgical correction), thyroid disorders (medication), and progesterone deficiency (supplementation)
  5. In 50% of RPL cases, no cause is found — but the prognosis is still favorable, with 60–75% of couples achieving a successful pregnancy with supportive care alone

When Pregnancy Loss Becomes “Recurrent”

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) defines recurrent pregnancy loss as two or more clinical pregnancy losses documented by ultrasound or histopathology. Previously, the threshold was three losses, but most reproductive endocrinologists now initiate testing after two.

Understanding the scope: approximately 15–20% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. Having one miscarriage does not significantly increase your risk of another. Having two losses raises the recurrence risk to approximately 25–30%. After three losses, the recurrence risk rises to 30–40%.

Chemical Pregnancies Count

Early losses confirmed by positive pregnancy tests (chemical pregnancies) are increasingly recognized in RPL evaluations, especially when they occur repeatedly. If you’ve had two or more chemical pregnancies, discuss with your RE whether a workup is warranted — even if the losses occurred before ultrasound confirmation.

The RPL Workup: What Tests to Expect

Test Category Specific Tests What It Rules Out
Genetic (both partners) Peripheral blood karyotype Balanced translocation or other chromosomal rearrangement (found in 3–5% of RPL couples)
Uterine anatomy Saline sonohysterogram (SHG), hysteroscopy, or MRI Uterine septum, fibroids, polyps, Asherman’s syndrome
Thrombophilia Antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, anti-beta2 glycoprotein I), Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), inherited clotting disorders
Hormonal TSH, prolactin, hemoglobin A1c, progesterone Thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, luteal phase deficiency
Immune (controversial) Natural killer (NK) cell assay, cytokine panels Immune dysregulation (evidence is limited; see our NK Cell Testing article)

Causes and Treatments

Chromosomal Abnormalities (50–60% of losses)

The most common cause of any pregnancy loss — and the most common identifiable cause of RPL — is aneuploidy (wrong number of chromosomes in the embryo). This is largely age-related: at 35, about 30% of embryos are aneuploid; by 40, it’s over 60%; by 43, over 80%.

Treatment: IVF with PGT-A (preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy) allows selection of chromosomally normal embryos before transfer. This reduces per-transfer miscarriage rates to under 10%, compared to 30–40% without testing. For couples where one partner carries a balanced translocation, IVF with PGT-SR (structural rearrangement) can identify embryos with the correct chromosomal complement.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)

APS is an autoimmune condition that causes blood clots in the placental vessels, leading to pregnancy loss — typically in the late first or second trimester. It is diagnosed when antiphospholipid antibodies are found on two tests at least 12 weeks apart.

Treatment: Low-dose aspirin (81mg daily) plus heparin injections starting at positive pregnancy test. This combination reduces loss rates from approximately 50–70% to 20–30% in APS patients.

Uterine Abnormalities

A uterine septum (a wall dividing the uterine cavity) is the most common structural cause of RPL. Fibroids distorting the cavity and intrauterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome) can also contribute.

Treatment: Hysteroscopic surgery to remove the septum, fibroids, or adhesions. This is typically outpatient with a 2–4 week recovery period. Post-surgical pregnancy rates improve significantly — septal resection reduces miscarriage rates from approximately 60% to 15%.

Thyroid Disorders

Both overt and subclinical hypothyroidism are associated with increased miscarriage risk. The ASRM recommends TSH levels below 2.5 mIU/L for women trying to conceive.

Treatment: Levothyroxine (thyroid hormone replacement). Dosing is adjusted to maintain TSH in the optimal range throughout pregnancy.

Unexplained RPL (50% of cases)

When the full workup reveals no identifiable cause, the diagnosis is “unexplained RPL.” This is frustrating but not hopeless. The prognosis for unexplained RPL is actually favorable: 60–75% of couples will achieve a successful pregnancy with supportive care (close monitoring, early ultrasounds, progesterone supplementation, and emotional support).

When to Consider IVF After RPL

IVF with PGT-A is not automatically recommended for all RPL patients. It is most beneficial when: the woman is over 37 (higher aneuploidy rates), a parental balanced translocation has been identified, or multiple losses have occurred despite treating other identified causes. For younger couples with unexplained RPL, trying naturally with close monitoring may be equally effective and far less invasive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I test the tissue from a miscarriage?+
If possible, yes. Products of conception (POC) testing can determine whether the loss was caused by a chromosomal abnormality. If the embryo was aneuploid, the loss was likely random and not indicative of a treatable underlying condition. If the embryo was chromosomally normal, it shifts the investigation toward uterine, hormonal, or immune causes. Ask your clinic about POC testing before a D&C procedure.
How soon can I try again after a miscarriage?+
Physically, most women can try again after one normal menstrual cycle following an early miscarriage. Research does not support the old recommendation to wait three months. However, if you’re undergoing RPL testing, your RE may recommend completing the workup before the next attempt so that any identified causes can be addressed. Emotionally, the right timing is entirely personal.
Does progesterone supplementation prevent miscarriage?+
Progesterone supplementation has modest evidence supporting its use in women with RPL. The PRISM trial (2020) found that vaginal progesterone starting at a positive pregnancy test increased live birth rates by 3–5% in women with a history of recurrent loss. It is generally considered low-risk and is widely prescribed, though it cannot prevent losses caused by chromosomal abnormalities.
🏥

Explore Your Treatment Options

Get matched with the right treatment plan for your diagnosis, age, and goals — from IUI to IVF and everything in between.

Explore Treatment Options →
🇨🇴

IVF Abroad: Save 50–70%

World-class fertility care in Colombia from $6,000 all-in. Same science, accredited clinics, a fraction of the cost.

Learn About IVF in Colombia →
Medical Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with a qualified reproductive endocrinologist or healthcare provider before making treatment decisions. ConceiveGuide does not provide medical diagnoses or treatment recommendations. Sources include ASRM, ACOG, CDC, SART, and peer-reviewed journals cited within the article.